<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Qology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://qology.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://qology.com</link>
	<description>Contact centre queue management and call back solutions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:15:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Careers with Qology by We&#8217;re hiring! &#124; Qology</title>
		<link>http://qology.com/careers/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>We&#8217;re hiring! &#124; Qology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qology.com/?page_id=1353#comment-83</guid>
		<description>[...] Careers [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Careers [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Qology&#8217;s callback solutions fully compliant with Ofcom&#8217;s guidance on silent and abandoned calls by Ofcom regulations on silent and abandoned calls come into force &#124; Qology</title>
		<link>http://qology.com/2010/07/qologys-callback-solutions-fully-compliant-with-ofcoms-guidance-on-silent-and-abandoned-calls/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>Ofcom regulations on silent and abandoned calls come into force &#124; Qology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 17:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qology.com/?p=150#comment-78</guid>
		<description>[...] reported back in June last year (http://qology.com/2010/07/qologys-callback-solutions-fully-compliant-with-ofcoms-guidance-on-silent-...), Qology&#8217;s callback solutions are fully compliant with Ofcom&#8217;s revised [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] reported back in June last year (<a href="http://qology.com/2010/07/qologys-callback-solutions-fully-compliant-with-ofcoms-guidance-on-silent-.." rel="nofollow">http://qology.com/2010/07/qologys-callback-solutions-fully-compliant-with-ofcoms-guidance-on-silent-..</a>.), Qology&#8217;s callback solutions are fully compliant with Ofcom&#8217;s revised [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why a centralised contact centre for booking doctors appointments is a good idea by Qology</title>
		<link>http://qology.com/2010/11/centralised-contact-centre-for-booking-doctors-appointments/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Qology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 12:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qology.com/?p=994#comment-49</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comment, Mr Small.

We certainly don&#039;t condone the use of high cost numbers (e.g. 0844) that some doctors&#039; surgeries use under the pretence that there are functional benefits to doing so. The same benefits are available on lower cost (03) or free of charge (0800) numbers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment, Mr Small.</p>
<p>We certainly don&#8217;t condone the use of high cost numbers (e.g. 0844) that some doctors&#8217; surgeries use under the pretence that there are functional benefits to doing so. The same benefits are available on lower cost (03) or free of charge (0800) numbers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why a centralised contact centre for booking doctors appointments is a good idea by Mr W. Small</title>
		<link>http://qology.com/2010/11/centralised-contact-centre-for-booking-doctors-appointments/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr W. Small</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qology.com/?p=994#comment-48</guid>
		<description>Attended a doctors appointment and needed to make a further appointment, asked at reception to do so, told that I would have to phone to make one as I couldnt do it there, asked why not and told that I had to phone to make one.
Went home and did so, after a while got connected and made an appointment, when phone bill came saw that It had cost me £0.55p, this is not the first time this has happened, Must write to Littlejohn in Daily Mail, sure he would enjoy chasing this one up and giving his comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Attended a doctors appointment and needed to make a further appointment, asked at reception to do so, told that I would have to phone to make one as I couldnt do it there, asked why not and told that I had to phone to make one.<br />
Went home and did so, after a while got connected and made an appointment, when phone bill came saw that It had cost me £0.55p, this is not the first time this has happened, Must write to Littlejohn in Daily Mail, sure he would enjoy chasing this one up and giving his comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached

Served from: qology.com @ 2012-02-23 01:57:12 -->
